Don Juan Comes to Philly
Interviews with Paula Vogel and Blanka Zizka
Don Juan Comes Home from Iraq is the result of two years of development, beginning with a conversation between Paula Vogel and Blanka Zizka during a playwriting “boot camp” led by Ms. Vogel in January 2011, where they discovered a mutual love of the Weimar Era playwright Ödön von Horvath. The conversation continued when Ms. Vogel spoke on the Wilma stage with her protégée Sarah Ruhl during the run of In the Next Room. This led to a decision, months later, to write a new play inspired by Horvath’s Don Juan Comes Home From the War. What followed was a process very unusual in the American theater: months of conversations between the artistic collaborators expanded to include encounters with veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan in interviews and playwriting workshops led by Ms. Vogel in Philadelphia, DC, and New York; the play was cast nearly a year ago, at a point when only a few pages of text existed, and the full script grew out of work with the actors in two workshops. During the December workshop, Paula and Blanka sat down for a conversation about the project. Here is the full transcript:
BLANKA ZIZKA - I think it’s amazing how we even met each other.
PAULA VOGEL - Yes, right.
BZ- Because we knew of each other.
BZ- But then it was in that fateful workshop that I didn’t want to take part of. I was so terrified of writing and you made me write, and then we found out that we both love Ödön von Horváth
PV- That’s right. And of course I’m a complete kind of stage mother. Every time there’s a breath - and I know how busy you are - I’m like, “Are you writing? Are you still writing?”
PV- Because the writing is beautiful.
BZ- Thank you. But anyway. (laughing) Let’s get over that part.
PV- So we meet in this workshop which was a very emotional weekend for me. I think at the end of the workshop I burst in tears. I couldn’t bear to say goodbye to the room. I just remember crying on my way out. And then we started talking and of course we knew of each other. And we discovered Von Horváth and we started to talk about this specific play.
BZ- Well we started first to talk about the adaption, I remember that. And you were coming to The Wilma and you were on the train.
BZ- You said, well we both were kind of saying, it‘s so much of its time. The 20s and 30s. Germany and Europe. And you were like I think it’s Don Juan Comes Back from Iraq.
BZ- Yeah, and then it was like a spark that started. That was the beginning of it.
PV- That’s right. We both got very excited about it in your office. That sometimes it’s better to pay homage by taking on the original challenge of bringing Don Juan to the present moment. Which is what Von Horváth did. Von Horváth brought Don Juan to the present moment in Germany but also by looking backwards a little bit, Don Juan after World War I. So we - people still ask, are we adapting it? And in some ways we are –
BZ- I think it’s more like a variation.
PV- A variation. Yea.
BZ- I don’t think that it’s totally a new fresh play but it’s playing a little ping-pong. A play looking back like, “Hey, wink, wink” at Ödön von Horváth and, “This is my response.” It’s Paula. Paula’s response. I think that’s kind of what’s happening, because I feel it’s very original, what we are getting at right now. And for anybody who doesn’t know Ödön von Horváth’s play they would not see that there is anything beyond this play that - except for the character of Don Juan - doesn’t make the play original and fresh. So there’s a kind of exciting thing about this that I have never done before, or I have done a long long time ago, and that is announcing a play that’s going to happen that has not been written. You know, we in American theater normally are waiting for the script. The script is our security, right? And we expect the script to be in such good shape that everybody can, the literary manager, the artistic director, the managing director, the marketing director of the theaters can say, “Yeah this is a good script and we’ll put it on its feet.”
BZ- And that’s what I’m kind of starting to wrestle with. The American theater has become so much about literature, you know. And for me, and for you too, I know because you are always talking about plasticity, but that theater is more than that, and we have kind of reduced the theater to literature many times.
PV- By doing that, and there’s become this kind of factory model of efficiency, which is the American not-for-profit, we’ve reduced the size of our ambitions. And when we look back at something like Don Juan, right? Or the classical cannon, these are writers who are writing unfinished work for a company, for the director, for the artist, for the village. And they will go back, in repertory, to that work over and over and over again. So the premise is that a script isn’t finished. A script is only finished by the process and the production. And that’s exciting.
BZ- So it’s an ongoing thing, it’s actually never quite finished because the next production can bring new things to it. New elements to it. I mean that is something that I have been really, really wrestling with in the last… about five years. I got to the point that the segmentation of the work that we do in the theater - which means the playwright writes a play in isolation, director picks it up, designers design, actors come last to the process and that it’s really artistically not sustainable and it’s also tiresome. It becomes a job to put the play on, instead of actually having a clear idea as to why we are doing it, what we want to say with it as a company as a collective, what we are taking on, what we are wrestling with, what we are encountering in our society that we want to talk about out loud with our audiences. You know, I feel that right now it’s - I think with this play we are trying to encounter and explore these possibilities, but it’s risky. It’s risky because clearly, we are working basically as a dance company in some ways. Dance Companies work this way. They kind of go into the project with, “Okay this is an idea that we are just going to explore and now we are at it and working at it and by three months later we’ll be showing what we have come up with to the audiences.”
PV- That’s right.
BZ- So this is kind of what we are doing.
PV- This is a first pass, and for me it’s incredibly thrilling. First of all, it’s kind of this great challenge, the glove thrown down. But secondly, I think that as the American theater has gone more to the factory - Model-T Ford, let’s just crank it out mode - my notion of theater and all of the artists that I fell in love with when I was really a young girl, the isolation has increased so much for writers because we are unattached to bodies and voices. And this collision, this wonderful creative collision of voices in the room and I’ve never in my life worked like this. It’s amazing.
BZ- It’s amazing. Considering how long you’ve been at it. For the first time in your life you’re writing for a company of actors.
PV- For the first time I feel like a company member. And I’m working for people whose voices who I’m hearing. I’m watching your work and your process and listening to the things that you respond with. I think this is the great thing for companies - that, you know, it’s more of a call and response then a synthetic piece of work. You keep the multiple voices alive when you work this way. It’s so thrilling.
BZ- I love also that you challenge the actors to become writers as well, because in that process of writing and the way that you set up the exercises, we reveal so much about ourselves and we do get to know each other so fast and so quickly. It’s amazing how you conducted, because we are not self-conscious about writing. Which I was afraid of the most when I took the first workshop with you. I was talking about my accent and the fact that I never studied English here in the United States. I never studied English, you know, even at school. And you told me, “Maybe you have different experiences from the person who speaks perfect English,” and I was like, “Okay.” And it really opened a door to something I had been keeping closed for such a long time, because I felt like I could not write because I am not the master of the language. English.
PV- But you are of your language.
BZ- I got to understand that. That it has rhythms and sounds and melody which is different.
PV- Yes, but very beautiful.
BZ- I am just loving it. That this is something that you give to everybody in the company, you know, and it’s not judgmental, or about our being the best writer, but about actually finding your music.
PV- Yeah. Right, right. I thought it was amazing yesterday that everyone around the table offered this beautiful, transparent voice and put it into the room. I don’t know if you feel this way, but because I do writing, I know everyone’s a writer. You know, it’s just freeing ourselves of the inhibitions that we are all kind of learning as we grow up, I think we inhibit ourselves out of art. Whereas, we all have it when we’re kids and so I figure everyone is a writer. And then I walk into the room and I see you and the company and you’ve stripped away the inhibitions about the body. You’ve stripped away the inhibitions about movement. And there’s a transparency about the body and the voice. And to me as a writer, that becomes a challenge, how can I try to match that transparency with word? Because I watch all of you and I think, “I don’t think I can do it.” But I think if I actually spent the time with you, I would get some sense of movement back in my body.
BZ- So about five years ago I realized that my aesthetic has been changing and I started to, I think starting somewhere around Eurydice, the play by Sarah Ruhl, and going into Macbeth and Angels in America, Our Class, and Scorched by Wajdi Mouawad that I had started to work with these open spaces and really focused on actors’ presence on stage. But I realized that my actors don’t have the training to fill the space. That they are very much in their faces and their hands. That’s kind of the naturalism that we have developed over the last thirty years in American theater and that when you open the space, like some of the Pina Bausch work you know, that the actors didn’t have the power inside themselves and in their bodies to fill the space. And so I thought, we need to change that. I started to work with Jean-Rene Toussaint and Theodoros Terzopoulos, both are European directors and teachers who are really focused on bringing the focus back into the body and actually activating the body’s imagination. That you are not imagining everything through your mind, which reduces everything right away because you are just then projecting your own experiences onto the character instead of the character actually giving you possibilities to grow and become larger than yourself or bigger than yourself or different than what you know. And I think those are possibilities, because the body has memories that are ancient, they are old and they can come out through these exercises. And so by doing these workshops, which we have been able to do through the Wilma, and actually we are paying actors to do these workshops because they are professionals. It’s very unusual I think. But through these workshops, I am developing a larger company around the Wilma and creating a language that is going to create a shortcut. So when we go into production we’ll have a group of actors who have already worked with each other and know what my aesthetic is and what I’m after. So it’s kind of like why we started the company earlier. You know, we don’t usually hire people a year before a production goes into rehearsal and then we take them through the workshops which, sometimes, don’t have anything to do with the text, it’s just about the exercises.
PV- Right. And then there’s the extraordinary luxury of knowing that we figured out the size of the company, the roles that we were going to use, and through the past year figuring out the basic structure of what our story is going to be. So through the workshops that I’ve been able to see, we actually created the acting company for this piece before a word was written. Which has been an extraordinary shortcut for me.
BZ- You know, it kind of creates a frame doesn’t it?
PV- It does.
BZ- …But frames are not bad.
PV- They’re wonderful.
BZ- Because then you can really fill them. That creates a world. You know, you have this. And with this I have to create, and I think sometimes it gives you more freedom.
PV- It gives a great deal of freedom having that frame. And the other thing that’s been really extraordinary is the way that I actually get to know people. This may seem strange but once I’ve heard someone’s writing I remember them always. People get freaked out by this because they’ll have written something in a workshop when we were together twenty years ago and I’ll bring it up. To me that’s just voice. And it changes my mind. It changes the synapses in my brain. So the fact that we’ve all been able to start with interviews, start with talking with people, we went first to Washington D.C., we did our first workshop with veterans around the table and now in Philadelphia. They’re short plays but I think they’re extraordinary work. It has been an incredible luxury, I think for us and our conversations, and a generosity from these veteran writers to share that.
BZ- I think what was amazing to me to see was you know I was so worried at the very beginning: how do I talk to veterans? Because first before we started to talk about this play I actually was not paying attention to the veterans almost whatsoever. And that’s something that I’ve learned - that only 1% of our population goes to war and they really are carrying the burden and they come back and nobody gives a damn and very few people actually deal with it. Stories of the veterans and what they had to go through and how they will come back just to live life and how they have to go through that process, I mean it was not on my mind whatsoever.
PV- So we’ve been participating with veterans in these workshops. I mean how are you feeling in terms of your initial - did you have an initial sense of being outside the experience or how to approach veteran experience?
BZ- Okay so, last year around this time I went to this workshop with Warrior Writers, and my first fear was that I was so isolated from their experience that there would be no bridge between us, my experience and theirs. What was kind of amazing that happened with the workshops that you started, the writing workshops, is that through the work we were all able to write about our own little dramas and I realized, “Oh my god my life is also filled with discontinuity.” And in a different way, also veterans’ lives were also about leaving one place and going to another place that was completely, you know, the normal becomes abnormal and abnormal becomes normal.
PV- Right, right.
BZ- And these exercises about estrangement that you were giving us were really revealing and connecting our experiences, and suddenly it was about us as creative people who are writing. And through the work we have found connections that I think would be very difficult to just find in a normal conversation. So that I found, again, how art, in a way, we get people together and start working on something together and suddenly you realize, “Okay, we are all the same underneath. Underneath all these experiences. We all have desires. We all want something. We all have losses. And we can write about it and start to understand each other.” And that was kind of amazing, this process is all amazing. And I love that you are also bringing actors into it and making them write.
PV- What’s also been thrilling for me, in particular, is we’ve done a couple of what I call bake offs. Where, all together as writers in a workshop, I ask people to write something in 48 hours. But in these workshops we’ve literally been writing short plays in an hour. So we wrote a St. Joan together with actors and veterans and we wrote the Swan Play about Leda and the Swan. And one of the things that I’ve been talking to the veterans writers about I can see on everyone’s faces - how much joy there is when you hear your words picked up by an actor’s and to see your words become flesh in the room. So I just remember that first sensation watching the veterans directing their own scenes and watching it come to life. And to me it’s that kind of odd paradoxical balancing act - that you can write and talk about the most fearful thing and yet there’s a vibrancy and joy when you give it over to actors and they lift it up. There’s a vibrancy.
BZ- But what is also amazing is the next step. When the veterans became actors.
BZ- And I was shocked because suddenly these men and women who looked to me in their mid-30’s they became 22 years old or 24 or - they really revealed their real age and that was quite another amazing step.
PV- I mean, this is always amazing to me period. Stripping off the inhibition. Stripping off the age and just plunging in, and I feel like we should cast them all. It’s been profoundly moving. But you know it brings me back to something else which I often say that I feel as a writer. There are two things I really need to be able to say and really feel. And this project is no different in terms of veteran experience. I will only understand a tiny smidgeon of experience. I’m a civilian. I can’t represent it. I have no right to represent it. But the fact that I want to understand it is sort of my primary charge. So, you know, I feel like there are two things always that I say: One is, “I’m sorry because I will always get it wrong.” And this is true if we decided to work on an adaptation of AJAX or an adaptation of Shakespeare or an adaptation of anything, do you know what I mean?
BZ- I think theater is not the truth.
PV- It’s not the truth! That’s right. It’s not the truth, we’re not going to be the perfect mirror. Hopefully though, again, what I hope is that there’s some lifting of the experience and a vibrancy that we can give back. And the second thing is to say, “Thank you.” You know, “I’m sorry, and thank you.” Because I think the veterans we’ve encountered and I’m thinking about all of the time that these veterans have given us and to go back and revisit their experiences and to tell us is incredible generosity.
BZ- I’m going to jump a little bit because the other thing about this process kind of what is - to me as a director, is it’s exciting to be dealing with the text so early, you know. And it’s exciting that we can actually talk about the plasticity of the possible performance at this early stage and that you can actually think about it as a writer, the world that we will be in. Which is not necessarily a naturalistic world. It’s something that is going to be happening at the Wilma and it will be more abstract, right?
BZ- And usually in a normal process the play is written and you kind of then put a dressing on it. And here we are creating metaphor right away from the very beginning that you know you’ll be working with.
PV- Right, and I’m trying, and hopefully achieving this - I want to be your scribe. I want to be a scribe to the company members. I want to be a scribe to Walter’s conversations and all of the incredible material that, you know, I feel that Walter and you have created a brain trust of research. I mean behind every word there’s your research.
BZ- No, we’re very lucky to have Walter, that’s for sure.
PV- Yeah, yeah. So, I mean, it makes me feel lighter because I’m scribing and responding to your impulse.
BZ- It’s a real collaboration that I haven’t experienced in a long time.
PV- Likewise. Never. Which is great.